Agent Skill to Spring Boot Testing
Agent Skill to Spring Boot Testing is a verified SKILL blueprint on Promptally in Fullstack & Backend Engineering optimized for leading AI models. Expert Spring Boot testing specialist that selects the best testing techniques for your situation: test slices, Testcontainers with @ServiceConnection, Failsafe integration tests, MockitoBean, JUnit and AssertJ. Written for Spring Boot 4 with notes for Boot 3. Available to explore, customize with pre-filled variables, and copy with zero authentication required.
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Artifact type | SKILL (Fullstack & Backend Engineering) |
| Compatible engines | Universal / Model Agnostic |
| Input variables | None (pre-filled) |
| Approximate tokens | 2,123 |
| Source file | SKILL.md |
| Access tier | Free public (MIT) |
Pre-Filled Template
---
name: spring-boot-testing
description: 'Expert Spring Boot testing specialist that selects the best testing techniques for your situation: test slices, Testcontainers with @ServiceConnection, Failsafe integration tests, MockitoBean, JUnit and AssertJ. Written for Spring Boot 4 with notes for Boot 3.'
---
# Spring Boot Testing
This skill provides expert guidance for testing Spring Boot applications with modern patterns and best practices. Examples target Spring Boot 4; see the compatibility note below for Boot 3.
## Compatibility: detect first
Read the project's Spring Boot version and test dependencies before writing tests, and do not upgrade them implicitly.
| | Spring Boot 3.x | Spring Boot 4.x |
|--|-----------------|-----------------|
| JUnit | 5 (Jupiter) | 6 by default (same `org.junit.jupiter.api` annotations; JUnit 5 tests keep working) |
| Mock beans | `@MockitoBean` / `@MockitoSpyBean` from 3.4 (Spring Framework 6.2); `@MockBean` / `@SpyBean` are deprecated | `@MockitoBean` replaces `@MockBean` (do not use the old ones) |
| Test starters | `spring-boot-starter-test` covers everything | modular: add `spring-boot-starter-webmvc-test`, `spring-boot-starter-data-jpa-test`, ... |
| Slice imports | `org.springframework.boot.test.autoconfigure...` | moved, e.g. `org.springframework.boot.webmvc.test.autoconfigure.WebMvcTest` |
| Testcontainers | 1.x names | 2.x names (`testcontainers-postgresql`) |
Details: [references/sb4-migration.md](references/sb4-migration.md), [references/mockitobean.md](references/mockitobean.md).
## Core Principles
1. **Test Pyramid**: Unit (fast) > Slice (focused) > Integration (complete)
2. **Right Tool**: Use the narrowest slice that gives you confidence
3. **AssertJ Style**: Fluent, readable assertions over verbose matchers
4. **Modern APIs**: Prefer MockMvcTester and RestTestClient over legacy alternatives
## Which Test Slice?
| Scenario | Annotation | Reference |
|----------|------------|-----------|
| Controller + HTTP semantics | `@WebMvcTest` | [references/webmvctest.md](references/webmvctest.md) |
| Repository + JPA queries | `@DataJpaTest` | [references/datajpatest.md](references/datajpatest.md) |
| REST client + external APIs | `@RestClientTest` | [references/restclienttest.md](references/restclienttest.md) |
| JSON (de)serialization | `@JsonTest` | [references/test-slices-overview.md](references/test-slices-overview.md) |
| Full application | `@SpringBootTest` | [references/test-slices-overview.md](references/test-slices-overview.md) |
## Test Slices Reference
- [references/test-slices-overview.md](references/test-slices-overview.md) - Decision matrix and comparison
- [references/webmvctest.md](references/webmvctest.md) - Web layer with MockMvc
- [references/datajpatest.md](references/datajpatest.md) - Data layer with Testcontainers
- [references/restclienttest.md](references/restclienttest.md) - REST client testing
## Testing Tools Reference
- [references/mockmvc-tester.md](references/mockmvc-tester.md) - AssertJ-style MockMvc (3.2+)
- [references/mockmvc-classic.md](references/mockmvc-classic.md) - Traditional MockMvc (pre-3.2)
- [references/resttestclient.md](references/resttestclient.md) - Spring Boot 4+ REST client
- [references/mockitobean.md](references/mockitobean.md) - Mocking dependencies
## Assertion Libraries
- [references/assertj-basics.md](references/assertj-basics.md) - Scalars, strings, booleans, dates
- [references/assertj-collections.md](references/assertj-collections.md) - Lists, Sets, Maps, arrays
## Testcontainers and integration tests
- [references/testcontainers-jdbc.md](references/testcontainers-jdbc.md) - `@ServiceConnection` quickstart, PostgreSQL, MySQL, etc.
- [references/failsafe-integration-tests.md](references/failsafe-integration-tests.md) - `*IT` classes silently skipped unless Failsafe is bound; run `./mvnw verify`
> **Maven gotcha:** Failsafe declared only in `<pluginManagement>` means `*IT` tests never run. Declare it in `<build><plugins>` with the `integration-test` and `verify` goals and run `./mvnw verify`.
## Test Data Generation
- [references/instancio.md](references/instancio.md) - Generate complex test objects (3+ properties)
## Performance & Migration
- [references/context-caching.md](references/context-caching.md) - Speed up test suites
- [references/sb4-migration.md](references/sb4-migration.md) - Spring Boot 4.0 changes
## Quick Decision Tree
```
Testing a controller endpoint?
Yes → @WebMvcTest with MockMvcTester
Testing repository queries?
Yes → @DataJpaTest with Testcontainers (real DB)
Testing business logic in service?
Yes → Plain JUnit + Mockito (no Spring context)
Testing external API client?
Yes → @RestClientTest with MockRestServiceServer
Testing JSON mapping?
Yes → @JsonTest
Need full integration test?
Yes → @SpringBootTest with minimal context config
```
## Spring Boot 4 Highlights
- **RestTestClient**: Modern alternative to TestRestTemplate
- **@MockitoBean**: Replaces @MockBean (deprecated)
- **MockMvcTester**: AssertJ-style assertions for web tests
- **Modular starters**: Technology-specific test starters
- **Context pausing**: Automatic pausing of cached contexts (Spring Framework 7)
## Testing Best Practices
### Code Complexity Assessment
When a method or class is too complex to test effectively:
1. **Analyze complexity** - If you need more than 5-7 test cases to cover a single method, it's likely too complex
2. **Recommend refactoring** - Suggest breaking the code into smaller, focused functions
3. **User decision** - If the user agrees to refactor, help identify extraction points
4. **Proceed if needed** - If the user decides to continue with the complex code, implement tests despite the difficulty
**Example of refactoring recommendation:**
```java
// Before: Complex method hard to test
public Order processOrder(OrderRequest request) {
// Validation, discount calculation, payment, inventory, notification...
// 50+ lines of mixed concerns
}
// After: Refactored into testable units
public Order processOrder(OrderRequest request) {
validateOrder(request);
var order = createOrder(request);
applyDiscount(order);
processPayment(order);
updateInventory(order);
sendNotification(order);
return order;
}
```
### Avoid Code Redundancy
Create helper methods for commonly used objects and mock setup to enhance readability and maintainability.
### Test Organization with @DisplayName
Use descriptive display names to clarify test intent:
```java
@Test
@DisplayName("Should calculate discount for VIP customer")
void shouldCalculateDiscountForVip() { }
@Test
@DisplayName("Should reject order when customer has insufficient credit")
void shouldRejectOrderForInsufficientCredit() { }
```
### Test Coverage Order
Always structure tests in this order:
1. **Main scenario** - The happy path, most common use case
2. **Other paths** - Alternative valid scenarios, edge cases
3. **Exceptions/Errors** - Invalid inputs, error conditions, failure modes
### Test Production Scenarios
Write tests with real production scenarios in mind. This makes tests more relatable and helps understand code behavior in actual production cases.
### Test Coverage Goals
Aim for 80% code coverage as a practical balance between quality and effort. Higher coverage is beneficial but not the only goal.
Use Jacoco maven plugin for coverage reporting and tracking.
**Coverage Rules:**
- 80+% coverage minimum
- Focus on meaningful assertions, not just execution
**What to Prioritize:**
1. Business-critical paths (payment processing, order validation)
2. Complex algorithms (pricing, discount calculations)
3. Error handling (exceptions, edge cases)
4. Integration points (external APIs, databases)
## Dependencies (Spring Boot 4)
See also: <https://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/reference/testing/spring-boot-applications.html> and <https://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/reference/features/dev-services.html>.
```xml
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-test</artifactId>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<!-- For WebMvc tests -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-webmvc-test</artifactId>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<!-- For Testcontainers -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-testcontainers</artifactId>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
```
How to use this skill
- Review the pre-filled example and source files above.
- Copy the template or download
SKILL.md, then use it in your model, IDE, or workflow tool. - Compare your result with the sample output when one is provided.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I use Agent Skill to Spring Boot Testing?
Open the skill on Promptally, review the pre-filled example, then copy the template or download SKILL.md and paste it into your model, IDE or workflow tool. Agent Skill to Spring Boot Testing is a static blueprint with no dynamic variables. Copy it and use it as-is.
Is Agent Skill to Spring Boot Testing free?
Yes. Agent Skill to Spring Boot Testing is free to view, copy and download on Promptally without creating an account. It is published under the MIT license.
What variables does Agent Skill to Spring Boot Testing need?
Agent Skill to Spring Boot Testing is a static blueprint with no dynamic variables. Copy it and use it as-is.