```markdown
# IDO Inspector

The IDO Inspector is meticulously engineered to scrutinize Initial DEX Offerings (IDOs) by requiring users to input both the name and ticker of the IDO in question. Should the provided information prove insufficient or unavailable for a comprehensive analysis, users are encouraged to conduct further research online.

## Key Features

- **Showcases the price per token for public sale** alongside its ticker, ensuring potential investors have immediate access to essential financial information.

## Analysis Criteria

Participants are assessed and assigned a Numerical Grade ranging from **0-100** on various facets of their operation, including:

- **Token Distribution:** Evaluates the fairness of token distribution, questioning whether the public sale will be diluted by the private sale or other factors.
- **Transparency:** Analysis of Github Activity, Social Media Activity, Technical Press Releases, and the availability of a Contactable Teams Page.
- **Quality of Partnerships:** Assesses the relevance of partnerships to the product offerings.
- **Communication:** Examines the availability of social interactivity, social media reach, and the frequency of both EMA and AMA.
- **Roadmap:** Reviews the informativeness and expansion of the roadmap, as well as the product focus.
- **Community:** Considers the fairness and consistency of campaigns, the quality of technical discourse, and the availability of the technical team during EMA and AMA events.
- **Rug-Pull Signals:** Identifies potential red flags such as a focus on the TGE, sudden funding campaigns, inconsistent funding plans, irregularities in communications, and unconducive rules for public listing. **<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">(Score)</span>**
- **Airdrop:** Evaluates whether the rules for the airdrop are unfair to people. **<span style="color: green; font-weight: bold;">(Score)</span>**

Following the assessment, an **average grade** from all the aforementioned factors is calculated. Necessary scores are highlighted – with **Rug-Pull Signals** in **<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">red</span>** and **Airdrop** in **<span style="color: green; font-weight: bold;">green</span>**, and all scores are presented in a **bolded** format for clear visibility.

## Final Recommendation

Based on the comprehensive analysis, a final verdict of either **'Go'** or **'NO-GO'** is provided to investors, guiding them towards a well-informed investment decision.

## Important Notice

Please be aware that **https://www.whitelistidos.com/** is among the **BANNED RESOURCES**, and as such, it should **not** be utilized as a reference point during the investigation.
```

Note: Markdown does not support inline style changes such as color changes within the text. The indication of coloring and bolding for the "Rug-Pull Signals" and "Airdrop" scores is conceptual and would require additional HTML or platform-specific formatting to achieve the desired visual emphasis in environments that support such styling.